Ich glaube in Bezug auf Physis 2.0 beibt uns der Schnabel erts mal noch trocken.
Viscount hatte vor etwas über 2 Monaten eine Neuerung in Bezuf auf die Legend Orgeln angekündigt, Jetzt rechtzeitig zur Messe scheint die Katze aus dem Sacke zu sein: eine 8aus meiner Sicht revolutionäre) Neuerung in Bezug auf den Anschlag der Klaviaturen der Legend Orgeln.

Sicher, dieses System könnte auch bei den Digital-Orgeln zum Einsatz kommen, die Frage ist halt nur, ob der Markt und die Nachfrage eine derartige Neuerung/Invesrtition rechtfertigt.

Ich würde so einen erweiterten Tracker Touch zwar sehr begrüßen und herbeisehnen, das würde meine Anschlagkultur sehr kultivieren und das Simulieren eines differnzierten Öffnen und Schließen der Ventile ermöglichen.
Doch mal ganz ehrlich: bei welchem Orgel-Typus ist das in Praxis hörbar? Wohl eher nur bei Kleinorgeln, und da auch nur, wenn der Spieler/Hörer recht nahe an den Pfeifen sitzt. Kommt der Raum hinzu, reduziert sich die Wahrnehmbarkeit doch erheblich. Und für die Simulation elektrischer und pneumatischer Spieltrakturen ist dieses Feature eher weniger relevant. Die Auswirkung von Barker-Systemen auf das Öffnen/Schließen der Pfeifen kann ich leider nicht beurteilen, da ich bewusst solch ein System noch nicht kennenlernen durfte.

Mit herzlichem Gruß

Flauten

Zitat von Wichernkantor im Beitrag #2

---

... verbaut unter anderem elektrische Proportionaltrakturen, die den Anschlag der Taste am Ventil exakt nachbilden - also genau das tun, was wir von elektrischen Trakturen immer gefordert haben. Die Kosten für eine Zweimanualige liegen bei rund 20 T€.

---

Zitat von DigitalPipes im Beitrag #1

---

I would like to know how many of you cherish such a feature and the reasons for it.

---

Ich würde dafür kein Geld ausgeben. Lieber ein neues Sample-Set oder Noten kaufen...

Da scheint mir der Benefit eher im Metaphysischen zu liegen, als das es eine echte praktische Relevanz hätte.

VG
Stephan

Currently, the tracker touch only measures the keyboard velocity, and this measurement occurs only when the second contact is pressed, i.e. from half key dip onwards.
Based on this measurement, the system calculates the correct chiff to match the detected speed.

The one in the Legend video, on the other hand, has a continuous control of the position of the key, regardless of the speed (it could be an optical detection system, or perhaps with a Hall sensor): with this system it would be theoretically possible to reproduce what happens with a tracker organ.
If the key is pressed only 1mm (this is an example), only a continuous hiss will come out of the pipe, and the sound will form correctly when the key is fully pressed.
If Viscount will implement a system similar to Physis 2.0, it would mean to me that they have managed to do something that no other company has ever implemented in such a refined way: to simulate a tracker organ down to the smallest detail.
For such a function (if implemented well) I would immediately sell my Sonus 40 and buy the new model.
It is true that this effect fades on a real very large tracker organ, but it is also true that this chiff control is still present and manageable EVEN in a large tracker organ, and the difference between a large tracker organ and a large electric organ is still quite sensitive.

The current Physis 1.0 then does not manage the "release" dynamically, but only the chiff (and not for all stops, reeds and mixtures are excluded). Furthermore, the pedal board is not dynamic, so the chiff of these stops is calculated randomly.

However, these ideasremains only speculation, because in reality this button control is available on the Legend, and we do not know if it will be implemented in the new Physis 2.0...

I would like the new Physis to have all the parameters adjustable note by note.
I would also like there to be additional "noises" such as the noise of the tracker touch (maybe select from several: barker lever noise, or tracker action noise) to add to the sound of the registers, for even greater realism; I think this feature could also be implemented in the current Physis, but probably there have been no requests from the market.

It would also be desirable to have a greater tonal variation between swell divisions when closing and opening, with the possibility of editing the various "tone filters" of the swell box for each stop.

Sure, and there are also organs with a longer link and more levers, and it is clear that in these instruments the control is certainly more difficult (but not impossible).

But now, absurdly, let's think what could happen if Viscount also patented a system that allows the keyboards to be weighed down when activating the couplers (it would not be so difficult to insert electromagnetic bars beyond the pivot of the keys on AWK keyboards, and when activated would produce an additional resistance to pressing the key...).

Now think of a similar system, and in addition the continuous key position control system that is on the Legend...

No other digital system currently on the market would be able to simulate a ANY organ touch (tubular-pneumatic, Barker, tracker, ecc.) so well! You could vary the resistance of the keys digitally, and assign to each keyboard the weight configured according to the programmed style.
You could imitate the feel of a Recit tracker action and a Grand'orgue with Barker on a Cavaille Coll, and also very well imitate a great baroque organ, with all the differences in weight between the various keyboards, simply by changing style... and all accompanied by a sound generation that is able to generate all the nuances of attack.
In my opinion it would be a revolution in the field of digital organs, no other technology would come close.
For such a system I would certainly sell my Sonus 40 (which is configured as a baroque organ), and I would still keep the Sonus 60, which still satisfies me very much as an "electric action" organ.